The barrier to turning legal expertise into content was never the knowledge — it was the time. Here's the exact repeatable workflow, prompt included, that fits into spare hours around a full caseload.
A lot of lawyers and legal consultants have knowledge that's genuinely valuable outside their day job — the kind of plain-English explanation of a legal process that people would pay for, or at least follow closely enough to become a referral source. The barrier was never the expertise. It was the time it takes to turn expertise into content, consistently, on top of billable work. That's the part Claude actually changes.
Pick a narrow lane, not a broad one
"Legal content" is too broad to build an audience around. "What small landlords in [your state] get wrong about eviction notices" is narrow enough that the right 200 people will find it useful, share it, and remember who wrote it. Narrow beats broad every time when you're one person doing this alongside a full caseload.
A repeatable content workflow
Here's the loop that actually fits into spare hours instead of requiring a second job:
I want to write a short post explaining [specific, narrow legal topic] for [specific audience, e.g. "small landlords with 1-5 units"] who have no legal background.
1. Draft it in plain English, 400-600 words.
2. Include one concrete, realistic example.
3. End with a clear disclaimer that this is general information, not legal advice, and that they should consult a lawyer for their specific situation.
4. Suggest 3 title options optimized for someone searching this question, not just an internal legal search term.I review every draft, correct anything that's slightly off, and add the specific detail or war story that makes it sound like it came from someone who's actually done this work — because it did. Claude gets you from a topic idea to a strong first draft in minutes; the parts that make it yours still take a human pass.
Where this leads, realistically
- Referrals. The most common outcome isn't ad revenue — it's someone reading a post, recognizing their own situation, and reaching out.
- A body of work you can point new clients to instead of re-explaining the same thing on every intake call.
- A LinkedIn presence that compounds. Short, specific posts about real situations you've handled (details changed, always) outperform generic "5 tips" content by a wide margin.
The disclaimer that always stays
Every single piece of public-facing content gets a clear, unambiguous disclaimer that it's general information, not legal advice specific to the reader's situation. Claude will include this if you ask it to — but the responsibility for making sure it's there, and that it's clear, is yours, not the model's.